TY - JOUR T1 - Assessing self-care and social function using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Y1 - 2008 A1 - Coster, W. J. A1 - Haley, S. M. A1 - Ni, P. A1 - Dumas, H. M. A1 - Fragala-Pinkham, M. A. KW - *Disability Evaluation KW - *Social Adjustment KW - Activities of Daily Living KW - Adolescent KW - Age Factors KW - Child KW - Child, Preschool KW - Computer Simulation KW - Cross-Over Studies KW - Disabled Children/*rehabilitation KW - Female KW - Follow-Up Studies KW - Humans KW - Infant KW - Male KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care) KW - Reference Values KW - Reproducibility of Results KW - Retrospective Studies KW - Risk Factors KW - Self Care/*standards/trends KW - Sex Factors KW - Sickness Impact Profile AB - OBJECTIVE: To examine score agreement, validity, precision, and response burden of a prototype computer adaptive testing (CAT) version of the self-care and social function scales of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory compared with the full-length version of these scales. DESIGN: Computer simulation analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal retrospective data; cross-sectional prospective study. SETTING: Pediatric rehabilitation hospital, including inpatient acute rehabilitation, day school program, outpatient clinics; community-based day care, preschool, and children's homes. PARTICIPANTS: Children with disabilities (n=469) and 412 children with no disabilities (analytic sample); 38 children with disabilities and 35 children without disabilities (cross-validation sample). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Summary scores from prototype CAT applications of each scale using 15-, 10-, and 5-item stopping rules; scores from the full-length self-care and social function scales; time (in seconds) to complete assessments and respondent ratings of burden. RESULTS: Scores from both computer simulations and field administration of the prototype CATs were highly consistent with scores from full-length administration (r range, .94-.99). Using computer simulation of retrospective data, discriminant validity, and sensitivity to change of the CATs closely approximated that of the full-length scales, especially when the 15- and 10-item stopping rules were applied. In the cross-validation study the time to administer both CATs was 4 minutes, compared with over 16 minutes to complete the full-length scales. CONCLUSIONS: Self-care and social function score estimates from CAT administration are highly comparable with those obtained from full-length scale administration, with small losses in validity and precision and substantial decreases in administration time. VL - 89 SN - 1532-821X (Electronic)0003-9993 (Linking) N1 - Coster, Wendy JHaley, Stephen MNi, PengshengDumas, Helene MFragala-Pinkham, Maria AK02 HD45354-01A1/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesR41 HD052318-01A1/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesR43 HD42388-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesComparative StudyResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralUnited StatesArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitationArch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):622-9. U2 - 2666276 ER -