TY - JOUR T1 - Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Y1 - 2006 A1 - Haley, S. M. A1 - Siebens, H. A1 - Coster, W. J. A1 - Tao, W. A1 - Black-Schaffer, R. M. A1 - Gandek, B. A1 - Sinclair, S. J. A1 - Ni, P. KW - *Activities of Daily Living KW - *Adaptation, Physiological KW - *Computer Systems KW - *Questionnaires KW - Adult KW - Aged KW - Aged, 80 and over KW - Chi-Square Distribution KW - Factor Analysis, Statistical KW - Female KW - Humans KW - Longitudinal Studies KW - Male KW - Middle Aged KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods KW - Patient Discharge KW - Prospective Studies KW - Rehabilitation/*standards KW - Subacute Care/*standards AB - OBJECTIVE: To examine score agreement, precision, validity, efficiency, and responsiveness of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC-CAT) in a prospective, 3-month follow-up sample of inpatient rehabilitation patients recently discharged home. DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective 1-group cohort study of patients followed approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge and then 3 months after the initial home visit. SETTING: Follow-up visits conducted in patients' home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four adults who were recently discharged from inpatient rehabilitation, with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, and medically complex conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Summary scores from AM-PAC-CAT, including 3 activity domains of movement and physical, personal care and instrumental, and applied cognition were compared with scores from a traditional fixed-length version of the AM-PAC with 66 items (AM-PAC-66). RESULTS: AM-PAC-CAT scores were in good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 range, .77-.86) with scores from the AM-PAC-66. On average, the CAT programs required 43% of the time and 33% of the items compared with the AM-PAC-66. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The standardized response mean (SRM) was greater for the movement and physical fixed form than the CAT; the effect size and SRM of the 2 other AM-PAC domains showed similar sensitivity between CAT and fixed formats. Using patients' own report as an anchor-based measure of change, the CAT and fixed length formats were comparable in responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimates for functional activity group-level changes can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a considerable reduction in administration time. VL - 87 SN - 0003-9993 (Print) N1 - Haley, Stephen MSiebens, HilaryCoster, Wendy JTao, WeiBlack-Schaffer, Randie MGandek, BarbaraSinclair, Samuel JNi, PengshengK0245354-01/phsR01 hd043568/hd/nichdResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralUnited StatesArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitationArch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Aug;87(8):1033-42. ER -