03123nas a2200385   4500008004100000020002200041245012900063210006900192250001500261260000800276300001000284490000700294520188400301653002502185653002702210653001502237653001002252653002102262653002802283653003802311653001102349653001102360653001102371653000902382653004602391653002702437653003002464653003202494100001502526700001602541700001602557700001502573700002502588856012402613       2005                        eng d  a0003-9993 (Print)00aAssessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory0 aAssessing mobility in children using a computer adaptive testing  a2005/05/17  cMay  a932-90 v863 aOBJECTIVE: To assess score agreement, validity, precision, and response burden of a prototype computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Mobility Functional Skills Scale (Mob-CAT) of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) as compared with the full 59-item version (Mob-59). DESIGN: Computer simulation analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal retrospective data; and cross-sectional prospective study. SETTING: Pediatric rehabilitation hospital, including inpatient acute rehabilitation, day school program, outpatient clinics, community-based day care, preschool, and children's homes. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred sixty-nine children with disabilities and 412 children with no disabilities (analytic sample); 41 children without disabilities and 39 with disabilities (cross-validation sample). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Summary scores from a prototype Mob-CAT application and versions using 15-, 10-, and 5-item stopping rules; scores from the Mob-59; and number of items and time (in seconds) to administer assessments. RESULTS: Mob-CAT scores from both computer simulations (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range, .94-.99) and field administrations (ICC=.98) were in high agreement with scores from the Mob-59. Using computer simulations of retrospective data, discriminant validity, and sensitivity to change of the Mob-CAT closely approximated that of the Mob-59, especially when using the 15- and 10-item stopping rule versions of the Mob-CAT. The Mob-CAT used no more than 15% of the items for any single administration, and required 20% of the time needed to administer the Mob-59. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable score estimates for the PEDI mobility scale can be obtained from CAT administrations, with losses in validity and precision for shorter forms, but with a considerable reduction in administration time.10a*Computer Simulation10a*Disability Evaluation10aAdolescent10aChild10aChild, Preschool10aCross-Sectional Studies10aDisabled Children/*rehabilitation10aFemale10aHumans10aInfant10aMale10aOutcome Assessment (Health Care)/*methods10aRehabilitation Centers10aRehabilitation/*standards10aSensitivity and Specificity1 aHaley, S M1 aRaczek, A E1 aCoster, W J1 aDumas, H M1 aFragala-Pinkham, M A  uhttp://www.iacat.org/content/assessing-mobility-children-using-computer-adaptive-testing-version-pediatric-evaluation-0