@article {261,
	title = {Maintaining content validity in computerized adaptive testing},
	journal = {Advances in Health Sciences Education},
	volume = {3},
	number = {1},
	year = {1998},
	note = {Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands},
	pages = {29-41},
	abstract = {The authors empirically demonstrate some of the trade-offs which can occur when content balancing is imposed in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) forms or conversely, when it is ignored. The authors contend that the content validity of a CAT form can actually change across a score scale when content balancing is ignored. However they caution that, efficiency and score precision can be severely reduced by over specifying content restrictions in a CAT form. The results from 2 simulation studies are presented as a means of highlighting some of the trade-offs that could occur between content and statistical considerations in CAT form assembly. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved).},
	keywords = {computerized adaptive testing},
	author = {Luecht, RM and de Champlain, A. and Nungester, R. J.}
}
