@article {15,
	title = {Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing},
	journal = {Psicothema},
	volume = {21},
	number = {2},
	year = {2009},
	note = {Barrada, Juan RamonAbad, Francisco JoseVeldkamp, Bernard PComparative StudySpainPsicothemaPsicothema. 2009 May;21(2):313-20.},
	month = {May},
	pages = {313-320},
	edition = {2009/05/01},
	abstract = {This paper has two objectives: (a) to provide a clear description of three methods for controlling the maximum exposure rate in computerized adaptive testing {\textemdash}the Symson-Hetter method, the restricted method, and the item-eligibility method{\textemdash} showing how all three can be interpreted as methods for constructing the variable sub-bank of items from which each examinee receives the items in his or her test; (b) to indicate the theoretical and empirical limitations of each method and to compare their performance. With the three methods, we obtained basically indistinguishable results in overlap rate and RMSE (differences in the third decimal place). The restricted method is the best method for controlling exposure rate, followed by the item-eligibility method. The worst method is the Sympson-Hetter method. The restricted method presents problems of sequential overlap rate. Our advice is to use the item-eligibility method, as it saves time and satisfies the goals of restricting maximum exposure. Comparaci{\'o}n de m{\'e}todos para el control de tasa m{\'a}xima en tests adaptativos informatizados. Este art{\'\i}culo tiene dos objetivos: (a) ofrecer una descripci{\'o}n clara de tres m{\'e}todos para el control de la tasa m{\'a}xima en tests adaptativos informatizados, el m{\'e}todo Symson-Hetter, el m{\'e}todo restringido y el m{\'e}todode elegibilidad del {\'\i}tem, mostrando c{\'o}mo todos ellos pueden interpretarse como m{\'e}todos para la construcci{\'o}n del subbanco de {\'\i}tems variable, del cual cada examinado recibe los {\'\i}tems de su test; (b) se{\~n}alar las limitaciones te{\'o}ricas y emp{\'\i}ricas de cada m{\'e}todo y comparar sus resultados. Se obtienen resultados b{\'a}sicamente indistinguibles en tasa de solapamiento y RMSE con los tres m{\'e}todos (diferencias en la tercera posici{\'o}n decimal). El m{\'e}todo restringido es el mejor en el control de la tasa de exposici{\'o}n,seguido por el m{\'e}todo de elegibilidad del {\'\i}tem. El peor es el m{\'e}todo Sympson-Hetter. El m{\'e}todo restringido presenta un problema de solapamiento secuencial. Nuestra recomendaci{\'o}n ser{\'\i}a utilizar el m{\'e}todo de elegibilidad del {\'\i}tem, puesto que ahorra tiempo y satisface los objetivos de limitar la tasa m{\'a}xima de exposici{\'o}n.},
	keywords = {*Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Psychological Tests/*standards/*statistics \& numerical data},
	isbn = {0214-9915 (Print)0214-9915 (Linking)},
	author = {Barrada, J and Abad, F. J. and Veldkamp, B. P.}
}
@article {17,
	title = {Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing},
	journal = {Spanish Journal of Psychology},
	volume = {11},
	number = {2},
	year = {2008},
	note = {Barrada, Juan RamonOlea, JulioAbad, Francisco JoseResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov{\textquoteright}tSpainThe Spanish journal of psychologySpan J Psychol. 2008 Nov;11(2):618-25.},
	pages = {618-625},
	edition = {2008/11/08},
	abstract = {<p>If examinees were to know, beforehand, part of the content of a computerized adaptive test, their estimated trait levels would then have a marked positive bias. One of the strategies to avoid this consists of dividing a large item bank into several sub-banks and rotating the sub-bank employed (Ariel, Veldkamp \&amp; van der Linden, 2004). This strategy permits substantial improvements in exposure control at little cost to measurement accuracy, However, we do not know whether this option provides better results than using the master bank with greater restriction in the maximum exposure rates (Sympson \&amp; Hetter, 1985). In order to investigate this issue, we worked with several simulated banks of 2100 items, comparing them, for RMSE and overlap rate, with the same banks divided in two, three... up to seven sub-banks. By means of extensive manipulation of the maximum exposure rate in each bank, we found that the option of rotating banks slightly outperformed the option of restricting maximum exposure rate of the master bank by means of the Sympson-Hetter method.</p>
},
	keywords = {*Character, *Databases, *Software Design, Aptitude Tests/*statistics \& numerical data, Bias (Epidemiology), Computing Methodologies, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/*statistics \& numerical data, Educational Measurement/*statistics \& numerical data, Humans, Mathematical Computing, Psychometrics/statistics \& numerical data},
	isbn = {1138-7416},
	author = {Barrada, J and Olea, J. and Abad, F. J.}
}
@article {297,
	title = {Requerimientos, aplicaciones e investigaci{\'o}n en tests adaptativos informatizados [Requirements, applications, and investigation in computerized adaptive testing]},
	journal = {Apuntes de Psicologia},
	volume = {19},
	number = {1},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {11-28},
	abstract = {Summarizes the main requirements and applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) with emphasis on the differences between CAT and conventional computerized tests. Psychometric properties of estimations based on CAT, item selection strategies, and implementation software are described. Results of CAT studies in Spanish-speaking samples are described. Implications for developing a CAT measuring the English vocabulary of Spanish-speaking students are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2005 APA )},
	keywords = {Computer Assisted Testing, English as Second Language, Psychometrics computerized adaptive testing},
	author = {Olea D{\'\i}az, J. and Ponsoda Gil, V. and Revuelta Men{\'e}ndez, J. and Hontangas Beltr{\'a}n, P. and Abad, F. J.}
}
